IELTS Writing Task 2 Band 8 Sample Essays (Latest 2025 Topics & Model Answers)

Preparing for the IELTS Writing Task 2 can feel overwhelming, especially if you are aiming for a Band 8 or higher. The writing section tests not only your grammar and vocabulary but also your ability to develop clear arguments, present balanced ideas, and structure essays logically.

Many students struggle to improve from Band 6.5–7.0 to Band 8 because they lack access to high-quality model answers that demonstrate exactly what examiners expect. To help you bridge that gap, we’ve created this collection of IELTS Writing Task 2 Band 8 sample essays based on latest and trending topics for 2025.

These model essays show you how to:

• Write strong introductions and conclusions.

• Use advanced but natural vocabulary.

• Maintain coherence and cohesion across paragraphs.

• Support arguments with real-life examples.

Whether you are preparing for the Academic or General Training IELTS, these Band 8 model answers will give you a clear idea of how to structure your essay and reach your target score. Use them as inspiration for your practice, not as memorized templates, because examiners value originality and critical thinking.

Scroll down to explore Band 8 sample essays on education, technology, and society—topics highly likely to appear in upcoming IELTS exams.

 Many feel that the common educational system of teachers and students in a classroom will be replaced by the year 2050.

Do you agree with this view? Give your opinion.

Some argue that by 2050, traditional classrooms with teachers and students will no longer exist due to the rapid rise of technology. While I agree that education will undergo significant transformation, I do not believe that the classroom will become obsolete.

On one hand, digital learning platforms and artificial intelligence are already reshaping education. Students can now attend virtual lectures, access recorded lessons, and even interact with AI tutors. By 2050, these tools are likely to become even more advanced, providing personalized learning at a scale that is impossible in traditional settings. This may reduce the need for physical classrooms, especially in higher education.

On the other hand, schools are not just about academic knowledge but also about socialization, teamwork, and discipline. Children learn essential life skills such as cooperation, empathy, and leadership by interacting face-to-face with peers and teachers. Such experiences cannot be fully replicated in a purely online environment. Therefore, even in 2050, classrooms will remain vital, although they will likely integrate more technology into the learning process.

In conclusion, while digital education will dominate by 2050, classrooms will not disappear entirely. Instead, a hybrid system combining technology and traditional teaching will become the norm.


Education should be free to all people and should be paid for and managed by the government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The idea that education should be free and financed by the government has been debated worldwide. I strongly agree with this statement as education is both a fundamental right and a long-term investment in society.

Firstly, education is a basic human right that should not depend on financial status. Free education ensures equal opportunities for children from all backgrounds, allowing them to compete fairly in the job market. Countries like Finland, where education is free, have demonstrated that this approach reduces inequality and increases social mobility.

Secondly, investing in education benefits the entire nation. A well-educated population contributes to economic growth, innovation, and social stability. For instance, free public universities in Germany have produced highly skilled workers who strengthen the country’s industries. Although providing free education requires substantial government funding, the long-term benefits far outweigh the costs.

In conclusion, education should be free and government-funded because it guarantees fairness and strengthens the economy. Societies that adopt this model will see greater progress in the future.


Nowadays, children watch a lot of TV and play video games. However, some think that these activities are not beneficial for a child’s mental health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With the popularity of television and video games, many parents are concerned about their impact on children’s mental health. While I agree that excessive use can be harmful, I believe these activities also offer certain benefits if used in moderation.

On the negative side, spending long hours in front of screens can lead to reduced attention span, lack of physical activity, and even social isolation. Violent video games, in particular, have been linked to aggressive behavior in children. Over time, these habits can affect not only mental health but also overall development.

However, television and games are not entirely harmful. Educational programs and age-appropriate games can improve cognitive skills, problem-solving abilities, and even language learning. For example, interactive games can encourage creativity and teamwork when played responsibly. The key is parental supervision and setting clear time limits.

In conclusion, television and video games are not inherently dangerous, but excessive use can damage a child’s mental health. A balanced approach, where entertainment is combined with outdoor activities and study, is the best solution.

Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to information in many countries. This is a danger to our societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 

The internet has made information available at unprecedented speed and scale. While this development has many advantages, I strongly agree that uncontrolled access poses serious risks to societies.

To begin with, the spread of misinformation and fake news is one of the most alarming consequences of free access. False information about politics, health, or culture can mislead millions of people within hours, leading to social unrest or even violence. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, unverified medical advice circulated online, putting lives at risk.

Moreover, uncontrolled information can expose children and vulnerable groups to harmful content, such as violent material or extremist propaganda. Without strict monitoring, young minds may be influenced in ways that damage moral values and social harmony.

However, it is equally important to acknowledge the benefits. Access to knowledge empowers individuals, supports education, and promotes innovation. The solution, therefore, is not to limit information completely but to regulate and verify its accuracy through government policies and digital literacy programs.

In conclusion, while free access to information brings progress, it must be controlled to prevent harm. Striking a balance between openness and regulation is crucial for a safe and informed society.

Criteria	Band 8 Requirements	Quick Checklist
Task Response	• Fully addresses all parts of the question. • Clear, consistent position throughout. • Well-developed ideas with relevant examples. • 250–320 words, concise and complete.	⬜ Did I answer every part? ⬜ Is my opinion clear? ⬜ Do I have examples for each point?
Coherence & Cohesion	• Logical paragraphing (Intro → Body 1 → Body 2 → Conclusion). • One clear idea per paragraph. • Wide range of linking words used naturally. • Smooth progression of ideas.	⬜ Clear structure? ⬜ Linking words varied? ⬜ Easy to follow flow?
Lexical Resource (Vocabulary)	• Wide range of precise vocabulary. • Paraphrases effectively. • Uses collocations/academic phrases naturally. • Rare errors only.	⬜ Have I avoided repetition? ⬜ Used academic words? ⬜ Vocabulary fits the context?
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	• Wide range of sentence structures (simple, compound, complex). • Very few errors (minor, not distracting). • High level of accuracy in tense, articles, prepositions, word order.	⬜ Do I use different sentence types? ⬜ Are my grammar errors rare? ⬜ Is punctuation correct?